I
appreciate good storytelling. No matter
what medium I’m working with, I strive to tell a good story. As a kid this manifested itself in many ways
– I’d draw and write comic books, I’d make videos with my friends, and I’d
write short stories and novels.
The last twenty years or so, I’ve worked in video games as a video editor, then a cinematic director and most recently as a writer – it’s great collaborative work that takes hundreds of people to successfully realize a vision. But as fun as it is, I’m still working on someone else’s world or property. Creatively, I wanted to get back to the world and character building I did as a kid. I wanted to express my creativity without the restrictions inherent to licensed material - for better or worse. So I decided to return to an old love and write original novels.
The last twenty years or so, I’ve worked in video games as a video editor, then a cinematic director and most recently as a writer – it’s great collaborative work that takes hundreds of people to successfully realize a vision. But as fun as it is, I’m still working on someone else’s world or property. Creatively, I wanted to get back to the world and character building I did as a kid. I wanted to express my creativity without the restrictions inherent to licensed material - for better or worse. So I decided to return to an old love and write original novels.
Your first
published novel was back in 1999 with Crusaders of a Dying Breed. Why did you
chose to write in the YA genre?
Crusaders
was an incredible learning experience for me – with a lot of hard lessons. Going through high school, I attempted to write
two novels. I would get about 80% of the
way before becoming disgusted with my own work.
I’d stop without finishing. That
needed to change. So in college, I set
out to finish a novel – any novel – to make it past that mental hurdle. I chose Crusaders because it was based on
stories and comics I had drawn my senior year in high school and the ideas were
still fresh in my mind. That was
undoubtedly the YA influence. To make
sure I finished, I wrote the novel backwards.
Yes, when I
received that feedback, I would foolishly dismiss it with a reactive: “What are
you talking about? You said it’s a fun
read! Why wouldn’t people buy something
fun to read?” So I published it myself
and was among a new generation of authors to take advantage of “on-demand”
publishing. This meant books were only printed
as they were ordered, so there was no waste in unsold copies. It seemed like the perfect solution.
In the
end, the traditional publishers were right.
Crusaders was incredibly hard to market, and I had no idea what I was
doing. It fizzled out pretty fast, and
then I got sucked into the video game world for the next twenty years.
Now, I
feel like I’ve come full circle with self publishing. Whereas with Crusaders, it was a necessity,
with The God Thought, it was a deliberate choice. I’d met with several agents for TGT and the
response was fantastic, but going that route would’ve meant another two years
of wrestling with a publisher before it ever hit the shelves, and I would still
have to do all the same things, marketing, etc. that I would be doing if I self
published. So I thought “the hell with
it” and opted to self publish. I could
maintain complete creative control, and success or fail, could put the thing
out on my own terms. It’s a hard road,
but I don’t regret it a bit.
What did
you learn in writing and publishing that first book that helped you with your
current one?
While
waiting for The God Thought to come online, I decided to read through Crusaders
for the first time in two decades. It
was a great read, witty, but I cringed every time I found a mistake in the
text, which happened far too often. I
never had Crusaders professionally edited or proofread. I couldn’t afford it at the time, but it’s
still a decision I greatly regret. It is
impossible for any writer to self-edit their work, no matter how many drafts
you go through.
One of
these days, I’ll revisit the work and give it the polish and professional
attention it deserves. But lesson
learned: ALWAYS have your work professionally edited and proofread. That’s something I took very seriously for The
God Thought. I also enlisted test readers throughout the entire process of writing
TGT. Since the book is a hybrid of
transcripts and narrative chapters, I wanted to make sure the ideas were being
communicated clearly and people weren’t getting lost.
For my first draft, I had a team of seven
people who would read five or six chapters as I wrote them. They’d give me blunt feedback as to what they
understood and where they thought the story was going. I’d never written a first draft like that
before and I found it incredibly insightful.
It also kept me from getting too attached to any bad ideas that I might have
fallen in love with on the way. I could
see clearly what wasn’t working and correct it.
I just wasn’t
ready for another go after Crusaders, and started working full time. I had a lot of growing up to do - as a
creative, as a writer, as a director – as a person. My day job keeps me incredibly busy and
fulfilled, but I’ve got that itch now to expand creatively. Writing is something I can do on my own time,
at my own pace for the rest of my life.
I understand it will be a long climb as a new independent author. I’m essentially starting from scratch. But I’m very proud of The God Thought. It’s reviewing very well, and I love hearing
from readers who had a great time with it.
The word will eventually spread.
It just takes time.
Give me a
short blurb on your current book, The God Thought.
The God Thought is about a farmer who one day has a moment of clarity so perfect, so divine, that all of life’s mysteries and secrets are revealed to him. Legend calls it the “god thought” because some believe it is what “God thought” to create the universe. But when the farmer experiences this, a terrible energy is released. The explosion levels a small town in the Midwest, killing thousands of people, including the wife and daughter of our protagonist, Oliver Wells. When the story begins, Oliver has just returned from a year-long sojourn of trying to pick up the pieces of his life. He is accosted by a stranger who tells him about his connection to the farmer. Oliver sets off to confront the man responsible for the death of his family, and soon finds himself in the crosshairs of secret factions looking to exploit the farmer’s knowledge.
When I tested
early drafts, it always surprised me how different men and women would
interpret specific scenes or language depicted in the book. It was important for me that the story appeal
to both sexes, so I put a lot of focus into finding a common language that
could illicit the responses I wanted.
Change one word in a sentence describing a romantic encounter and it can
become very appealing to men while turning women off entirely, or visa versa.
What do
you think makes a sci-fi work or not work for the reader?
Believable
and relatable characters are key for science fiction. There’s a lot of crazy stuff that happens in The
God Thought, and I revel in the spectacle of it, but what legitimizes those
crazy things is how the characters react to them. If a character doesn’t feel genuine,
especially in their reactions to the world you’ve created, a reader isn’t going
to buy anything that happens in your story.
What type
of research do you do for your books?
I research
as I go. If I can’t find accredited
sources online that will answer my questions, I’ll contact experts in the
field. Sometimes they get back to me,
sometimes they don’t.
How do you write? Do you do an outline first?
These days, when I start a project, I’ll mull the idea around for a long time. Eventually I’ll start pitching it to a few select people just to see how they react. Concept ideas need to be really strong and thought out before diving in. That may sound rather obvious, but I’ve seen so many of my contemporaries charge headfirst into a project saying things like: “I’m going to write an exciting adventure!” Or “We’re going to make a great 3rd person shooter action game!” Fine goals, but what is it about your idea that’s going to draw people to it? What is it about your idea that’s going to differentiate it from the billion other ideas out there? If you can’t sum it up and get people to take notice with a good “elevator pitch” you should go back to the drawing board.
The reality is, the number one thing that sells books today is the author’s name. No one knows who I am - so that’s a wash. The number two thing that sells books is a referral from a friend. I need to get people to take a chance on it, read it, and then enjoy it so much they grab one of their friends and scream to them: “You have to read this!” That’s why sites like Goodreads are so important. It’s a collection of hardcore readers who devour books and are looking for their next “fix.” Hopefully you can get on the radar and make your book their meal. But your book better taste awesome.
I’ve been
told that the more books I publish, the more I’ll sell. That seems rather obvious, but I’ve no
interest in cranking out books for the sake of cranking out books. I want them done right.
Since you
previously have experience in doing promotional trailers and few authors have
that skill, what would you suggest to a newbie who wants to do a trailer?
I’m not
convinced that book trailers make that big of an impact on sales, but that may
be because I haven’t seen one that has succeeded at it. There are a lot of cheap looking book
trailers out there and a lot of cheap companies who will gladly take your money
to create one. So if you decide to do
one, try to be clever in your approach and spend the time and money to make it
look good. I’ve got a great script for
my own, but will only pull the trigger if I become convinced the money will
come back in sales.
What do
you know now about writing/publishing now, you wished you had known sooner?
I’m amazed
at how slow the publishing industry moves - even with all the advances in
technology and communications we have today.
But the fact is, reading, editing and proofing one’s writing takes a considerable
amount of time. Compare this to a pointless
90 second video about Whiskers the Cat recorded on a smart phone, and how that
thing can go viral and get a gazillion hits in less than a day – it’s a little
depressing. But the fact is, watching
that video is a low risk investment for viewers. It’s free, it’s short, and if it sucks, a
viewer has only wasted 90 seconds of their time staring at their phone,
something they check all the time anyway.
Reading a novel is a more sizable investment of time and energy. Readers have to focus on what they’re doing,
they have to think about what they’re reading, and it takes longer than 90
seconds to appreciate it. The fastest
anyone was ever read my book is in ONE DAY.
On average, readers will get through it in ONE WEEK. So if I’m counting on my book building
momentum through word of mouth, I need to be incredibly patient for that
process to run it’s course while seeking more avenues to court first time
readers. It’s a
marathon that I’ll be running over the course of years to come.
My current
challenge is deciding on what to focus on next.
I wrote the first draft of a fantasy novel years ago, now I want to go
back and polish it. I would love to
revisit Crusaders and give it the proper love.
There’s a crazy side project called Ghost Provokers: The Official Guide
to Kicking Ghost Butt based on a comedy web series I used to do with
friends of mine. I’ve got an unusual idea
for an erotic thriller that I want to explore.
And of course, there is the sequel to The God Thought. I’m still an unknown author, so I could probably
focus on any of these and move the ball forward. But as they are all very different genres I
want to be smart about the decision I make.
That's if for today's interview. If you'd like to learn more about Dave's current writing or upcoming works, here are a couple of options: www.thegodthought.com www.facebook/thegodthought
No comments:
Post a Comment